Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters

Ewa Gumul

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-226-3349-6

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Śląski

Rok wydania:

2017

Liczba stron:

334

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

Gumul, Ewa. Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters. Red. . Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, 2017, 334 s. ISBN 978-83-226-3349-6

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A1 Gumul, E.

T1 Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters

PB Uniwersytet Śląski

PP Katowice

YR 2017

SN 978-83-226-3349-6

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 190656, author = "Gumul, Ewa", editor = "", title = "Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters", publisher = "Uniwersytet Śląski", year = "2017", address = "Katowice", isbn = "978-83-226-3349-6" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU - Gumul, Ewa

ED -

TI - Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters

PB - Uniwersytet Śląski

CY - Katowice

PY - 2017

SN - 978-83-226-3349-6

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

Gumul, Ewa. Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters [baza danych online] Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, 2017 [dostęp: 25 08 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/explicitation-in-simultaneous-interpreting-a-study-into-explicitating-ewa-gumul-190656.

tłumaczenie symultaniczne, eksplicytacja, ograniczenia w przekładzie ustnym, protokoły retrospektywne, kierunkowość, strategie tłumaczenia ustnego, styl tłumacza

Przedmiotem pracy jest zjawisko eksplicytacji w tłumaczeniu symultanicznym. Do niedawna uważano, że eksplicytacja, jako zjawisko często przybierające formę amplifikacji tekstowej, występuje niezwykle rzadko w przekładzie symultanicznym, gdzie ogra...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-226-3349-6

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Śląski

Rok wydania:

2017

Liczba stron:

334

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

ContentsList of abbreviations /9
Introduction /11
PART ONE Theoretical background and research methodologyChapter 1. Explicitation /19
1.1 Defining explicitation /20
1.1.1 Definitions of explicitation in previous research /20
1.1.2 Language independence of explicitation /23
1.1.3 Explicitation versus addition, amplification, and overtranslation /28
1.1.4 Explicitness and implicitness /32
1.2 Taxonomies of explicitation /38
1.2.1 Séguinot’s addition and specification /38
1.2.2 Klaudy’s causal typology /39
1.2.3 Vehmas-Lehto’s category of over-explicitation /42
1.2.4 Klaudy and Károly’s transfer operations /43
1.2.5 Perego’s types and forms of explicitation /45
1.2.6 Kamenická’s and Hopkinson’s functional classifications /47
1.2.7 Pápai’s explicitation strategies /50
1.2.8 Murtisari’s scalar and categorical explicitation /51
1.3 Research methods and frameworks /52
1.4 Causes of explicitation /57
1.5 Explicitation as a translation universal /63
Chapter 2. Explicitation and its surface manifestations /66
2.1 Adding connectives /70
2.2 Intensifying cohesive ties /74
2.3 Lexicalisation of pro-forms /75
2.4 Reiteration /77
2.5 Filling out elliptical constructions /79
2.6 Adding modifiers and qualifiers /81
2.7 Inserting hedges and discourse organising items /83
2.8 Explicitating shifts involving proper names /84
2.9 Including additional explanatory remarks and providing full forms forabbreviations /87
2.10 Replacing nominalisations with verb phrases /90
2.11 Disambiguating lexical metaphors /94
2.12 Lexical specification /96
2.13 Meaning specification /98
3.1 Aims and research questions /99
Chapter 3. Research methodology /99
3.2 Research design /101
3.2.1 Method /101
3.2.2 Participants /105
3.2.3 Corpus /106
3.2.4 The experimental procedure /108
3.3 Taxonomy of surface manifestations of explicitation /111
3.4 Conceptual framework /114
3.4.1 The Time Constraint /117
3.4.2 The Linearity Constraint /125
3.4.3 The (Un)shared Knowledge Constraint /132
3.4.4 The Memory Load Constraint /136
4.1 Working definition of strategy in simultaneous interpreting /143
PART TWO AnalysisChapter 4. Explicitation and strategy /143
4.2 Previous research /145
4.3 Analysis /146
4.3.1 Adding connectives /154
4.3.2 Intensifying cohesive ties /159
4.3.3 Lexicalisation of pro-forms /161
4.3.4 Reiteration /165
4.3.5 Filling out elliptical constructions /174
4.3.6 Adding modifiers and qualifiers /177
4.3.7 Inserting hedges and discourse organising items /184
4.3.8 Shifts involving proper names and abbreviations /187
4.3.9 Including additional explanatory remarks /195
4.3.10 Replacing nominalisations with verb phrases /199
4.3.11 Disambiguating lexical metaphors /202
4.3.12 Lexical specification /205
4.3.13 Meaning specification /211
5.1 Directionality in interpreting /220
Chapter 5. Explicitation and directionality /220
5.2 The pilot study /224
5.3 Analysis /227
5.3.1 Adding connectives /230
5.3.2 Reiteration /232
5.3.3 Adding modifiers and qualifiers /236
5.3.4 Disambiguating lexical metaphors /239
5.3.5 Meaning specification /240
5.4 Correlation with the results of the survey on directionality /243
6.1 Translator and interpreter style /252
Chapter 6. Explicitation and interpreting style /252
6.2 Relating explicitation to translator and interpreter style /255
6.3 Analysing interpreter explicitating style – methodological considerations /257
6.4 Analysis /260
6.4.1 Frequency /260
6.4.2 Consistency /263
6.4.3 Distinctiveness /270
Conclusions /281
AppendicesAppendix 1: The frequency of explicitating shifts for each of the 120 participants /285
Appendix 2: Surface forms of all shifts (reported and unreported) /288
Appendix 3: Surface forms of reported shifts /294
Appendix 4: The number of all retrospective comments verbalised by theparticipants /300
Appendix 5: Reasons for explicitation reported by the participants in retrospectiveprotocols /304
References /305
Streszczenie /325
Resumen /329

24___

___

__Chapter1.Explicitation

moreovertcohesivedevices“regardlessoftheincreasetraceabletodifferences

betweenthetwolinguisticandtextualsystemsinvolved”(Blum-Kulka1986:19).

However,notallresearchersshareBlum-Kulka)sopinion.Insomestudies-in-

terestingly,irrespectiveofthepublicationdate-thetermexplicitationhasbeen

usedasanumbrellatermcoveringunavoidableshiftswhichinevitablyleadto

greaterexplicitness.

Althoughtheydonotcommentexplicitlyonthisissue,VinayandDarbelnet

(1958l1995)clearlyattributesomecasesofexplicitationtothesystemicdiffer-

encesbetweenthelanguagesinvolved.Thisisunderstandablegiventheobjective

andscopeoftheirwork,whichisessentiallyacontrastiveratherthanpurely

translationalapproach.Similarly,Delisleetal.(1999:139)claimthatinsome

cases,explicitationmaybe“duetoconstraintsimposedbythetargetlanguage.”

ExplicitationrequiredbydifferentgrammaticalsystemsisalsopartofKlaudy)s

(1998l2011)broadtaxonomy,3inwhichshedistinguishesbetweenobligatory,

optional,pragmatic,andtranslation-inherentexplicitation,consideringallof

theresultingshiftsaslegitimatecasesofexplicitation.Inthesamevein,Hop-

kinson(2008)distinguishesbetweentranslation-inherentexplicitatingshiftsand

language-constrainedones(althoughobligatoryexplicitationisnottheobject

ofhisstudy),thelattercategorycorrespondingtoKlaudy)sbothobligatoryand

optionalexplicitation.

Obligatoryexplicitationisconditionedbythedifferencesinthesyntactic

andsemanticstructureofthelanguages.Thesearetheshiftswhichthetransla-

torisobligedtoperform;otherwise,thetargettextwouldbeungrammatical

(Klaudy1998l2011:106).Giventhatlanguagesdifferintheirinherentlevelsof

explicitnessduetotypologicaldifferences(Séguinot1988;House2004),transla-

tionsincertainlanguagepairsandcertaindirectionsoftranslationtriggermore

obligatoryexplicitatingshifts.Thisis,forexample,thecaseoftranslationfrom

syntheticintoanalyticlanguages.Forinstance,Klaudyidentifiesgrammatical

features,suchas,amongothers,lackofprepositionsandpresenceofcomplex

inflectedcaseendingsinsyntheticHungarian,whichresultinmanyadditions

inthesurfacestructurewhentranslatedintoEnglish(Klaudy1993:72).

Themostfrequentcausesofobligatoryshiftsaretheso-calledmissingcat-

egories(Klaudy1993:72).Inquantitativeterms,translationsfromPolishinto

Englishwouldincludemanyobligatoryadditions,forinstance,intheformof

indefiniteanddefinitearticles.Asaresult,definitenessorindefinitenessare

moreeffectivelyencodedinEnglish.Bycontrast,inqualitativeterms,gender-

markedverbsinPolishmakethetranslationofcertainverbalforms,likeIwas,

moreexplicit,aswehavetooptforoneofthetwovariantsdependingonthe

genderofthesubject:themasculineformbyłemorfemininebyłam.Vinayand

Darbelnet(1958l1995)alsogiveexamplesofstructuralambiguitythatinevitably

Foradetailedaccountofexplicitationtaxonomies,seeSection1.2.

Brak wyników

Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A Study into Explicitating Behaviour of Trainee Interpreters

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra