Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE

Aleksander Wolicki

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-235-3490-7

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Warszawski

Rok wydania:

2018

Liczba stron:

285

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

Wolicki, Aleksander. Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE. Red. . : Uniwersytet Warszawski, 2018, 285 s. ISBN 978-83-235-3490-7

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A1 Wolicki, A.

T1 Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE

PB Uniwersytet Warszawski

YR 2018

SN 978-83-235-3490-7

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 197492, author = "Wolicki, Aleksander", editor = "", title = "Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE", publisher = "Uniwersytet Warszawski", year = "2018", address = "", isbn = "978-83-235-3490-7" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU - Wolicki, Aleksander

ED -

TI - Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE

PB - Uniwersytet Warszawski

CY -

PY - 2018

SN - 978-83-235-3490-7

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

Wolicki, Aleksander. Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE [baza danych online] : Uniwersytet Warszawski, 2018 [dostęp: 07 07 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/spartan-symmachy-in-the-vi-and-v-century-bce-aleksander-wolicki-197492.

sparta, symmachy, Peloponnesian League, Peloponnesian War, Archaic Period, Spartan treaties

The book contains systematic critique of the traditionalist model’s historiographical assumptions concerning the Spartan alliances in the VI and V century BCE. First chapter is devoted to the critique of the sources. In the second chapter we...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-235-3490-7

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Warszawski

Rok wydania:

2018

Liczba stron:

285

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Spis treści niedostępny

1.1.TeSpartan-Aitoliantreaty

hisanalysisofthescript.However,becauseoftheformalsimilaritiesbetweenthe

treatywiththeAitoloiandthetwotreatiesfromtheperiodaferthePeloponnesian

War,oneneedstoaskthefollowingquestions:dothesesimilaritiesreﬂectstabil-

ity(anduniversality)oftheSpartandiplomaticformulas?orperhapsoneshould

consideragreaterchronologicalproximityoftheagreementsand,consequently,

acknowledgethemorerecentdateoftheSpartan-Aitoliantreaty?

Teopposition-ofdisputablevalueinitself-betweenthemediocrelettering

andirregularlayoutoftheSpartaninscriptionandtheCregularity,meticulousex-

ecution,andelegance)ofAthenianinscriptionsoftheclassicalperiod,constituted

forPeekthepointofdepartureforhisdatingofthetext.Buttheearlyoriginofthe

treatywiththeAitoloiwasalsosupposedlyprovedbytheshapesofsomeofthe

letters(especiallyepsilon,piandsigma),whichwerediferentfromthoseobserved

inmorepreciselydatedSpartaninscriptionsfromthetimesofthePeloponnesian

War.

Infuneraryinscriptionsexecutedinstoneinthisperiodwedonotﬁnd

elongatedverticalhastainepsilon,pihasrightangles,theverticalhastaofphi

protrudesvisiblyfromthecircle,whilesigmaisfour-bar.Tesediferences,ac-

cordingtoPeek,forceustoadoptaconsiderablyearlierdateforthetreatywiththe

PeekagainstCartledgeandKelly(seebelow),whileaddingtothemhisownpoints;ontheother

hand,heproposedaslightlymorerecentdateincomparisontotheoneproposedbyPeek,plac-

ingthedocumentinmid-ﬁfhcentury,seebelow,p.30andn.23.InﬂuencedbyCozzoli)sargu-

ments,SantiAmantinichangedhisopinionandacceptedthedateoftheSpartan-Aitoliantreaty

CattornoallametàoentroilterzoquartodelVsec)

.([1997]216,cf.219n.16).Thommen(1996)59

n.28and127,andPikoulas(2000-2003)(nonvidi)acknowledgedasimilardateasCozzoli,

althoughforslightlydiferentreasons.Loomis(1992)60-61,onaccountofthestyleofthescript,

which,inhisopinion,ismuchmorearchaic,placedthetreatyconsiderablyearlierthanthelist

ofcontributionstotheCSpartanwarfund)

,datedbyhimto427BCE:IGV.11+SEG36.357(it

followsfromhisargumentationthathehadnotnoticedthatbetweentheeditionofLSAGand

thearticleof1988LilianJeferychangedheropinionconcerningthedateoftheCSpartanwar

fund);formoreinformationaboutthedateofthisinscriptionseebelow,p.27).Teextremely

earlydate(endofthesixthcentury)oftheSpartan-Aitoliantreatywasproposed,solelyonthe

basisofthescript,byHenrivanEfenterreandFrançoiseRuzé,seeNomimaI55,andaferthem

Richer(1998)543-544n.44.Forfurtherreferencestotheliteratureconcerningthedateofthe

inscriptionseeRhodes(2011)1087-1088.Itisworthnothingthatscholarsseemtoagreethat

theinscriptionwasinscribedimmediatelyafertheconclusionofthetreaty;thustheepigraphic

andhistoricalargumentsareusedonequalterms.

TisconcernsIGV.1702,1124and1125(LSAGLaconia59,60,and58respectively).Te

procedureadoptedbyPeekseemstoresultfromhisdecisiontolimithisanalysisoftheLakonian

epigraphytoexamplesincludedinthethenrecentlypublishedstudybyLilianJefery(LSAG).

Jefery,however,wasonlyinterestedininscriptionsnolaterthantheendoftheﬁfhcentury.

Consequently,PeekhasnotinspectedinmoredetailtheLakonianinscriptionsofthefourth

century,whichcouldhaveinﬂuencedhisdatingofthetreaty.

Brak wyników

Spartan symmachy in the VI and V century BCE

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra