Treść książki

Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
Prawo1nieodłącznytowarzyszczłowieka
25
panzzwischendemRechtunddemLeben(unterschiedlicheDefinitionenvonderGerechtigkeit).
DieSchlussfolgerungheißt:dasRechtisteineguteLebensgesellschaftdesMenschen,wennder
nurinFriedenlebenwollte.
RemigiuszSobański
Lawman’sintegralcompanion
Summary
Thearticleconstitutesanoriginalandinterestingreflectionofanoutstandingtheoretician
oflawonlaw-manrelations.Theauthorshowsanambivalentattitudetolawasaresultofits
appreciation,emphasizingatthesametimeanimportantroleoflawintheEuropeancivilization.
Askingwhetherlawisagoodcompanionforman,Sobańskiadmitsthattheveryquestionisnot
purelyabstractiveasitderivesfromtheobservationofthereality.Thisambivalenceinrelation
tolawisexplainedastheresultofappreciatingtheverylaw.
Thehistoryoflawisatthesametimethehistoryofcontroversiesaroundthenotionoflaw
anditsnature.Though,thefactthatlawexistsisnotcontroversialitself.Lawisunderstood
differentlyandthewayofconveyinglaw(inanoralorwrittenmanner)isalsodifferent.The
authorunderlinesthatlawisatoolofjustice,namelyameansofexecutingjustice.Herefersto
therepresentativesoftheRomanlaw,andstopsattheunderstandingofthestatement“Ihavea
right”,analysesUlianov’sdefinitionofjustice(lawcanbeatoolofjusticeifthewillofjustice
exists).Next,hepointstothepressuretouchingthewholelawpractice:lawtakesintoaccount
readinessforperceivingposterioriwhereasitmakessenseonlywhenitispossibletoexecutethis
perception.Hepaysattentiontothecausesofdiscrepanciesbetweenlawandlife(lackofagree-
mentwhenitcomestothenotionofjustice).Hisconclusionisthatlawisagoodcompanionof
manwhenhe/shewantstoliveapeacefullife.