Treść książki

Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
IncestinthemonumentsofEuropeancriminallaw
untilthe18
th
century
IntheRomanlaw,incestwasdescribedbythenotionofincestumanim-
moral,disgracefulandgodlessactcontraveninggoodpractices.Inthelegalsystems
oftheGermanicstatesandinthelawoftheFranks,thecircleofindividualsbetween
whomthesexualintercoursewasregardedasincestuouswasextendedunderthe
influenceoftheCanonlaw.TheregulationsoftheRomanlawandtheCanonlaw
mergedandshapedthecontentofthelaterlawoftheReich.Penalizationofincest
inConstitutioCriminalisCarolinawasnotclearasthedoctrineoflawwasunderthe
influenceofthegeneralRomanlaw(iuscommune)andtheopinionsofauthorities
werequotedintheprocessoflawinterpretation(Carpzov).Adiversifiedevaluation
ofincestwaspresentedinConstitutioCriminalisTheresianawithanextensivelist
ofcircumstancesaggravatingandmitigatingcriminalresponsibility.